<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Family Law Uphold &#8220;Maher&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prenuptialagreements.org/maher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prenuptialagreements.org/maher/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:23:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.prenuptialagreements.org/maher/comment-page-1/#comment-55742</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 02:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prenuptialagreements.org/maher/#comment-55742</guid>
		<description>&quot;why should mahr be less of a contact?&quot;
Stupid question. Selling the body and putting price tag on herself is prostitution. It is against the dignity of women and that so-called agreement does have other clauses which stress out the obedience of the wife-to-be. A partial execution of agreement make it void. From the comments here I can see that people(women and pussified guys) just want free ride. They ignore many legal facts, which is no surprise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;why should mahr be less of a contact?&#8221;<br />
Stupid question. Selling the body and putting price tag on herself is prostitution. It is against the dignity of women and that so-called agreement does have other clauses which stress out the obedience of the wife-to-be. A partial execution of agreement make it void. From the comments here I can see that people(women and pussified guys) just want free ride. They ignore many legal facts, which is no surprise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adel</title>
		<link>http://www.prenuptialagreements.org/maher/comment-page-1/#comment-54801</link>
		<dc:creator>Adel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 04:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prenuptialagreements.org/maher/#comment-54801</guid>
		<description>Is Maher payable if the wife seeks to leave the husband. Over a silly mistake he made[ Swore at her a few times and then left the house]  - later said sorry and sat her down and promised he would not do it again!

1 is she allowed to get a Khula over such a little matter

2 Does she have a right to Maher is she is leaving him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Maher payable if the wife seeks to leave the husband. Over a silly mistake he made[ Swore at her a few times and then left the house]  &#8211; later said sorry and sat her down and promised he would not do it again!</p>
<p>1 is she allowed to get a Khula over such a little matter</p>
<p>2 Does she have a right to Maher is she is leaving him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ebi</title>
		<link>http://www.prenuptialagreements.org/maher/comment-page-1/#comment-50665</link>
		<dc:creator>Ebi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 07:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prenuptialagreements.org/maher/#comment-50665</guid>
		<description>Mahr has no place in secular law. It i relogious- based and initiated by Quaran andenterd by muslim man and woman in different social context.. It is buy and sell contract and selling sedx for money, it is in conflict with variety of local family laws and if  Mahr even is considered a contract, it comes with other contractual items like wmen do not have right to divorce, there i no provision of spousal support, a contract can not be implemented unilaterally, it is a family debt which should be devided. Better speaking a secular court can not enforce the maher as it violates local laws ad creates wide rang of complexity. People who think it i a pre-nap have no ida about the legal matters. Any court rulling  that orders in favor of Mher can ealy b overturned b Supreme court</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mahr has no place in secular law. It i relogious- based and initiated by Quaran andenterd by muslim man and woman in different social context.. It is buy and sell contract and selling sedx for money, it is in conflict with variety of local family laws and if  Mahr even is considered a contract, it comes with other contractual items like wmen do not have right to divorce, there i no provision of spousal support, a contract can not be implemented unilaterally, it is a family debt which should be devided. Better speaking a secular court can not enforce the maher as it violates local laws ad creates wide rang of complexity. People who think it i a pre-nap have no ida about the legal matters. Any court rulling  that orders in favor of Mher can ealy b overturned b Supreme court</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umm Mohammed</title>
		<link>http://www.prenuptialagreements.org/maher/comment-page-1/#comment-48861</link>
		<dc:creator>Umm Mohammed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prenuptialagreements.org/maher/#comment-48861</guid>
		<description>Man and woman marry. Maher is agreed to be paid at a later during the Nikah ceremony. Few months into marriage, wife is having extramarital affairs with other men while husband is at work. Wife is divorced. Question: Is the maher still due the ex wife? Some people say yes...some people say no? Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man and woman marry. Maher is agreed to be paid at a later during the Nikah ceremony. Few months into marriage, wife is having extramarital affairs with other men while husband is at work. Wife is divorced. Question: Is the maher still due the ex wife? Some people say yes&#8230;some people say no? Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DFA Law Northampton Solicitors</title>
		<link>http://www.prenuptialagreements.org/maher/comment-page-1/#comment-37880</link>
		<dc:creator>DFA Law Northampton Solicitors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prenuptialagreements.org/maher/#comment-37880</guid>
		<description>Would be interesting to see a few more cases on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be interesting to see a few more cases on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

